Monday, July 20, 2015

BUILDING PREMIUM - BMC chief promises transparent template : The Times of India



The state urban development department has reversed its controversial decision to exempt some builders from paying a hefty premium to the BMC for building extra areas, reports Nauzer Bharucha.
The state government came under fire with allegations that its May 21, 2015 notification favoured some big builders constructing luxury residential towers in the island city.The BMC would have lost several hundred crores due to the exemption.

A TOI expose in May revealing the state government's largesse finally pushed it on the back foot and forced it to issue a written clarification last week. “The civic chief must use his discretionary powers to levy full premium.These powers must be used judiciously,“ UDD secretary Nitin Kareer told TOI. The state has done a Uturn on its decision to exempt builders from paying a big premium for constructing extra areas in their luxury towers. :Last week, the urban development department wrote to municipal commissioner Ajoy Mehta stating that such builders be charged ull premium (60% of the locality's ready reckoner rate) for building extra areas in their residential projects.

“We will now have to set up a air, unbiased and transparent template so that there are no allegations of favouritism against us when we charge this premium on a project-to-project basis,'' Mehta told TOI.

The controversy pertained to builders who procured their basic construction permissions prior to January 6, 2012. On that day, a new law mandated charging 60% premium on builders who want to build 35% extra space.Earlier , these extra spaces were iberally sanctioned by municipal commissioners free of cost.When the new law kicked in, developers whose projects were caught between the old rule and the new one lobbied hard with the government to exempt them.

The new law exempted builders who commenced construction prior to January 6, 2012. But the rule said when these builders apply for further permissions to complete the building, they would be charged the full premium for that portion of the construction. Infuriated, builders began lobbying hard with the government to exempt them.

The May 21, 2015 UDD notification brought cheer to these builders because it made no men tionof chargingthemthefullpre mium. The opposition Congress lambasted the government for the largesse, but BJP shot back sayingtheproposalwasfirstiniti ated last year by the then Prithvi raj Chavan-led government.

The BMC too had opposed the government's move to ex empt such builders. Besides los ingrevenue,thecivicadministra tion warned the state it would allow builders to misuse large ar eas which were arbitrarily sanc tioned by successive municipa commissioners between 2005 and 2010. Though the new law allows 35% extra construction, these towers were allowed to build over 50% to 60% extra areas, compris ing flower beds, parking decks balconies etc. The biggest project that will now come under BMC's scanner is One Avighna Park, a luxury residential project near Currey Road station in centra Mumbai. Its developer Kailash Agarwal had opposed paying the premium on the grounds that his project had procured permis sionspriortoJan.6,2012.Thepro ject comprises two towers of 64 floors each with “sky villas and sky mansions“. The project has been stuck for the past couple of years because of this issue.

Another large project is an under-construction, high-end luxuryskyscraperatNepeanSea Road called Sesen, owned by Sat ellite Group, but now taken over by Pune-based builder Avinash Bhosale. The initial permissions were procured prior to the Janu ary 6, 2012 cut-off date, but the de veloper will now have to pay pre mium when it seeks sanction for further construction.

No comments:

Post a Comment